What We Learned About Google Organic Non-Branded Traffic Calculation and Why It Might Be Flawed

Table of contents:

The Challenge: Google Search Console Sampling and Inaccurate Traffic Calculation

When analyzing organic traffic, distinguishing between branded and non-branded traffic is key for understanding your SEO performance. Google Search Console (GSC) provides valuable insights, but its sampling method poses a challenge. GSC only shows a subset of total queries, and this sampling can lead to incomplete data, especially when trying to calculate the split between branded and non-branded traffic.

Why Filtering Queries in GSC Leads to Inaccurate Results

To calculate branded vs. non-branded traffic in GSC, many SEOs rely on filtering queries:

  • Branded queries: Including the brand name or variations.
  • Non-branded queries: Excluding the brand name.

However, because GSC samples data, this method introduces errors:

  • The branded filter shows only a subset of branded queries.
  • The non-branded filter removes branded queries but still suffers from incomplete sampling.

This results in a lower sum of branded and non-branded clicks, often much lower than the total clicks reported by GSC, which causes discrepancies in the analysis.

Example: How GSC’s Sampling Affects the Traffic Calculation

Let’s look at a real example to see how the filtering method causes inaccuracies:

  • Total clicks reported by GSC: 188K
    What We Learned About Google Organic Non-Branded Traffic Calculation and Why It Might Be Flawed
  • Branded clicks (via filter): 32K
    What We Learned About Google Organic Non-Branded Traffic Calculation and Why It Might Be Flawed
  • Non-branded clicks (via filter): 85.5K
    What We Learned About Google Organic Non-Branded Traffic Calculation and Why It Might Be Flawed

If the filtering method worked accurately, the sum of branded and non-branded clicks would equal the total: 32K + 85.5K = 117.5K

But GSC reports 188K clicks, leaving a 70.5K gap unaccounted for. This gap occurs because GSC samples data and excludes certain queries in its filters, resulting in incomplete insights.

The Better Way: A More Accurate Method for Estimating Non-Branded Traffic

For medium-to-large websites, where there’s a significant gap between total clicks and sampled query clicks in GSC, a more reliable approach is to use the total click count and subtract branded clicks. This method ensures a more accurate estimation, particularly for larger websites where sampled query data may not reflect the full picture. Here’s how:

  1. Extract Total Clicks from GSC for a given period (without filtering).
  2. Extract Branded Clicks using a regex filter for all variations of the brand name.
  3. Estimate Non-Branded Traffic by subtracting branded clicks from total clicks:
    Total Clicks − Branded Clicks = Non-Branded Clicks

What We Learned About Google Organic Non-Branded Traffic Calculation and Why It Might Be Flawed

Why This Method Works Better

  • Branded queries are usually well-represented in the sample: Branded searches tend to have higher click volumes, so they’re more likely to be included in the sample.
  • Accurate total clicks: GSC reports total clicks accurately, even though query-level data is sampled.
  • No reliance on filtering: Subtracting branded clicks from the total avoids the issues introduced by query-based filtering and gives a more complete picture.

Key Takeaways

  • Sampling in GSC leads to incomplete data, making it difficult to accurately calculate branded vs. non-branded traffic.
  • Subtracting branded clicks from the total is a better method for estimating non-branded traffic, avoiding the pitfalls of query filtering.
  • Understanding the split between branded and non-branded traffic is essential for refining SEO strategies and measuring brand performance accurately.

By following this approach, SEOs can gain a clearer understanding of organic traffic distribution and avoid being misled by the limitations of GSC’s sampled data.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Excellent choice πŸ’ͺ

Excellent choice πŸ’ͺ

I am interested in?

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed quis rhoncus libero. Vivamus interdum fringilla erat.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed quis rhoncus libero. Vivamus interdum fringilla erat.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed quis rhoncus libero. Vivamus interdum fringilla erat.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed quis rhoncus libero. Vivamus interdum fringilla erat.